Posts Tagged ‘porn’
Porn and BitTorrent? – Yes, the Rumors are True!
Written by admin on December 14, 2009 – 5:28 pm -Yep, it’s true. You read it here first. There’s pr0n on BitTorrent sites.
Pornography and the Internet go together like peanut butter and jelly; so why should BitTorrent miss the boat? They haven’t. Pr0n, being a multi-billion dollar industry, has not eluded both public and private torrent sites alike. Love it or hate it – Internet pr0n brings big traffic. Which in turn brings in mad advertising dollars. Sorry, Jon Huntsman Jr., but it appears that the mob has spoken. Grab your life jacket and get aboard – here’s a list of private adult BitTorrent sites that are accepting new registrations. Read more »
Are rights holders seeding files to sue downloaders?
Written by admin on September 1, 2009 – 6:35 pm -A German software developer is alleging that a company hired by rights holders to hunt down file sharers actually helped to seed the file he eventually got sued for, according to a report from heise.de.
Hannover-based software developer Daniel Finger got sued for downloading and distributing a pornographic video via Emule. However, Finger not only maintains that he got duped into downloading the movie through misleading file names, he also thinks he actually received the movie from the very people that later helped to bring charges against him – a practice that would be very close to entrapment, and in this case quite possibly illegal itself.
The crux of the case is that Finger used a modded no upload Emule client, meaning the client was only able to download dta, but not contribute anything to the network. That kind of behavior is frowned upon in P2P communities, but it’s also been regarded to be an effective shield against potential lawsuits. Don’t upload any data, and no one will know what kind of files you’re downloading. No one except the people you’re downloading from, that is.
Of course it’s debatable whether rights holders can use their own works as baits to catch file sharers. Some might call this entrapment, while others would probably argue that rights holders can distribute their works however they chose to, and still insist on the exclusive right of distribution. Read more »


